PER CURIAM.
[¶1] Kindi Jalloh appeals from judgments entered after a jury found him guilty of tampering with evidence and murder. On appeal, Jalloh argues the district court erred in denying his N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion for judgment of acquittal because the jury had insufficient evidence to find him guilty of tampering with evidence and murder.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.