BRYANT, Judge.
Where the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to intervene ex mero motu because the prosecutor commented that "only two people in this courtroom ... actually know what happened," where the admission of testimony from a serologist regarding a comparison of DNA profiles did not amount to plain error, and because we do not review contentions arising out of closing arguments for plain error, we hold there was no error in the judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
