Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael P. Boulette , Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent.
Charles H. Thomas , Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services, Inc., Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Julia Craig , Southern Minnesota Regional Legal Services, Inc., Mankato, Minnesota, for appellant.
Ben M. Henschel , Henschel Moberg Goff, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota; and David L. Olson , Edina, Minnesota, for amicus curiae Minnesota Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.
Sarah J. Runchey , Runchey, Louwagie & Wellman, Marshall, Minnesota; Mary Catherine Lauhead , Law Offices of Mary Catherine Lauhead, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Michael D. Dittberner , Linder, Dittberner, Bryant & Winter, Ltd., Edina, Minnesota, for amicus curiae Family Law Section of the Minnesota State Bar Association.
OPINION
HUDSON, Justice.
The issue before us is whether the best-interests-of-the-child standard in Minn. Stat. § 518.175, subd. 5(b) (2016), or the endangerment standard in Minn. Stat. § 518.18(d)(iv) (2016), applies to the motion of respondent Eric John Christensen to increase his parenting time to every other week. Christensen...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.
GET STARTED
OR
