BANDEMER v. FORD MOTOR CO.

A17-1182.

913 N.W.2d 710 (2018)

Adam BANDEMER, Respondent, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellant, Eric Hanson, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed April 23, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kyle W. Farrar , Kaster, Lynch, Farrar & Ball, L.L.P., Houston, Texas; and Steven D. Lastovich , Steven D. Lastovich, Ltd., Baxter, Minnesota (for respondent).

Michael R. Carey , Scholastica N.S. Baker , Bowman and Brooke, L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Sean Marotta , (pro hac vice), Hogan Lovells US L.L.P., Washington, D.C. (for appellant).

Considered and decided by Cleary, Chief Judge; Reyes, Judge; and Jesson, Judge.


OPINION

In this appeal from the district court's denial of appellant Ford Motor Company's (Ford) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Ford argues that Minnesota does not have specific personal jurisdiction over it because respondent Adam Bandemer's injury did not arise from Ford's contacts with Minnesota. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases