1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 886 N.W.2d
  5. 886 N.W.2d 658 (2016)
 

KAEDING v. AULECIEMS

No. A16-0479.

886 N.W.2d 658 (2016)

Andrew KAEDING, et al., Respondents, v. Karl AULECIEMS, Appellant, Susanne Auleciems, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 31, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Birnberg , Samuel C. Spaid , Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Karl Auleciems, Lake Elmo, MN, pro se appellant.

Susanne Auleciems, Lake Elmo, MN, pro se appellant.

Considered and decided by HOOTEN, Presiding Judge; PETERSON, Judge; and BRATVOLD, Judge.

OPINION

In this landlord-tenant dispute regarding forfeiture of security deposits, pro se appellant landlords challenge the district court's summary judgment that the forfeiture clause in a lease is unenforceable and the district court's award of attorney fees, costs, and disbursements to respondent tenants. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases