1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 851 N.W.2d
  5. 851 N.W.2d 598 (2014)
 

WALSH v. U.S. BANK, N.A.

No. A13-0742.

851 N.W.2d 598 (2014)

Laura L. WALSH, Respondent, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 6, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin A. Carlson , Law Offices of Martin A. Carlson, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN; and Roy B. Henline , Henline Law, P.A., Maple Grove, MN, for respondent.

Charles F. Webber , Colton D. Long , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

OPINION

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

We granted review in this case to decide a question of great interest and consequence to parties and their lawyers in civil cases: whether the plausibility standard announced in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009), applies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases