Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Appellant bank challenges the judgment entered against it following a jury trial, arguing that (1) the district court erred by finding that, as a matter of law, the bank owed fiduciary duties to respondents, who were participants in the bank's securities-lending program; (2) the jury's finding that the bank breached fiduciary duties owed to respondents is inconsistent with and precluded by the jury's other findings...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.
GET STARTED
OR
