ROLLER v. WAGNER, FALCONER & JUDD, LTD.

No. A10-1255.

Christopher Roller, Appellant, v. Wagner, Falconer & Judd, Ltd. c/o Dan Smith, Respondent, Alexander Gese, et al., Respondents, Honorable Judge Mark Boris, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed March 15, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Roller , Redwood Falls, Minnesota, pro se appellant.

Mark A. Solheim , Paula Duggan Vraa , Larson King, LLP, St. Paul, Minnesota, for respondent Wagner, Falconer & Judd.

Richard B. Allyn , Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents Alexander Gese, et al..

Considered and decided by Kalitowski, Presiding Judge; Worke, Judge; and Stauber, Judge.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Pro se appellant Christopher Roller challenges the district court's award of summary judgment in favor of respondents, arguing that discovery was insufficient and reversal is necessary to reopen discovery. We affirm.

DECISION

Appellant commenced this action against Wagner, Falconer & Judd Ltd. (WFJ) "c/o Dan Smith via PrePaid Legal," alleging that a conflict of interest exists with WFJ and Smith...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases