MOE v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

No. A09-958.

773 N.W.2d 77 (2009)

Janet L. MOE, Respondent, v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, Self-Insured/Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Relators, and University of Minnesota Physicians, Fairview Health Services, Inc., Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 5, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Lund, Law Offices of Donald F. Noack, Jr., Mound, MN, for respondent.

Roderick C. Cosgriff, Heacox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff & Johnson, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 27, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases