DUMAS v. MILLER

Docket Nos. 141355, 141356, 141357, 141358, 141359. COA Nos. 279149, 286342, 286343, 286344, 287143.

799 N.W.2d 11 (2011)

489 Mich. 977

Richard DUMAS, Lynn McBride, Eugene Pasko, Harold Counts, John Maus, Kenneth Kwasnik, Richard Bennett, Patrick Chapman, Charles Dapprich, James Dziadziola, Estate of Gerald Fitzgerald, Estate of Vernon Manus, Estate of George Massab, Lawrence Mylnarek, Estate of Robert Sinclair, Charles Osterdale, Robert J. Songer, Robert Deckers, Elizabeth Zinner, Richard Stimpson, Donald Durecki, and Ronald Rieus, Plaintiffs, and Wayne Alarie and Richard Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, and Theodore S. Andris, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Sheldon L. MILLER, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Auto Club Insurance Association, Defendant. Gerald Nylund, Anita Nylund, John House, Mary Ellen House, David Remer, Donna Margaret Remer, Leonard Rakowicz, Rita Rakowicz, Stanley Elzinga, Marilyn Elzinga, James Haller, Joan Haller, John Jackson, Willie Johnson, Edward Bartz, Betty Bartz, Frank Dolinshek, Mary Dolinshek, Michael Dungey, Winifred Dungey, Frances Stocker, Arthur Shewchuk, Patricia Shewchuk, David Albrecht, Linda Albrecht, William T. Medlin, and Shirley Medlin, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick, P.C., and Sheldon Miller, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Wayne Alarie and Richard Martin, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick, P.C., and Sheldon Miller, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Robert Deckers, Elizabeth Zinner, Richard Stimpson, and Donald Durecki, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, and Harold Counts, Robert Ivan, and Richard Zickel, Plaintiffs, v. Sheldon L. Miller and Lopatin, Miller, Freedman, Bluestone, Erlich, Rosen & Bartnick, P.C., Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellees, and David Ravid, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 28, 2011.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's December 27, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

MARKMAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in this case, 488 Mich. 1009, 791...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases