1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 102 A.3d
  5. 102 A.3d 1168 (2014)
 

REMMEL v. CITY OF PORTLAND

Docket No. Cum-14-42.

102 A.3d 1168 (2014)

2014 ME 114

Charles REMMEL et al. v. CITY OF PORTLAND et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided: October 16, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Danielle P. West-Chuhta, Esq. , and Patricia A. McAllister, Esq. , (orally), City of Portland, Portland, for appellant City of Portland.

Mary E. Costigan, Esq. , Bernstein Shur, Portland, for appellant 32 Thomas Street, LLC.

Bruce A. McGlauflin, Esq. , (orally), Petruccelli, Martin & Haddow, LLP, Portland, for appellees Charles Remmel, et al.

Orlando E. Delogu, Esq., (orally), appellee pro se.

Panel: ALEXANDER, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, and HJELM, JJ.

[¶ 1] The City of Portland and 32 Thomas Street, LLC, appeal from a summary judgment entered by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Wheeler, J.) in favor of Charles and Kathy Remmel and other residents of Portland's West End. In its judgment, the court concluded that the Portland City Council's approval of a conditional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases