1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 190 A.3d
  5. 190 A.3d 344 (2018)
 

SUGARMAN v. LILES

No. 80, Sept. Term, 2017.

190 A.3d 344 (2018)

460 Md. 396

Stanley SUGARMAN, et al. v. Chauncey LILES, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 31, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Michele R. Kendus (Kendus Law LLC, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for petitioners.

Argued by Bruce H. Powell (The Law Offices of Peter T. Nicholl , Baltimore, MD), on brief, for respondent.

Argued Before: Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ.

This case presents yet another opportunity for clarification of when epidemiological studies relied upon by an expert provide a sufficient factual basis for the expert's testimony. Specifically, we shall consider whether an expert's opinion on causation, relying on epidemiological studies, suffers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases