PER CURIAM.
At issue in this case is whether the court of appeal erred in finding there are genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment on plaintiff's invasion of privacy claim. For the reasons that follow, we conclude defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeal.
UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, Frank Tate, was employed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
