1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.3d
  4. 5 N.E.3d
  5. 5 N.E.3d 797 (2014)
 

PURDUE UNIVERSITY v. WARTELL

No. 79A02-1304-PL-342.

5 N.E.3d 797 (2014)

PURDUE UNIVERSITY, Appellant-Defendant, v. Michael A. WARTELL, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

March 24, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dina M. Cox , Janelle P. Kilies , Lewis Wagner, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

J. Blake Hike , Larry L. Barnard , Mark D. Ulmschneider , Carson Boxberger LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

The question we address today is this: may a party be equitably estopped from asserting the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine? In this case, Purdue University promised Chancellor Michael A. Wartell that an independent investigator acceptable to him, who was preferably (but not necessarily) an attorney, would be appointed to investigate a complaint that he had filed against Purdue's president...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases