PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court's order denying appellant's petition for writ of mandamus and declaring appellant to be a vexatious litigant. We affirm the court's order denying appellant's motion for disqualification, which was legally insufficient.
The trial court erred as a matter of law by finding that appellant had "failed to allege that he has made the [lower] court aware of the pending motion," citing Chapman v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.