ALLEN, J.
The appellant challenges convictions entered after the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. The evidence should have been suppressed as the product of an unlawful search in connection with the warrantless entry into the appellant's back yard, and the convictions are therefore reversed.
At hearings on the motion to suppress it was indicated that sheriff's officers received a tip about possible ongoing criminal activity at the appellant's residence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
