ORDER
KEITH STARRETT, District Judge.
On May 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration [52] of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order [39] granting Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [42] as to Plaintiff's claims for punitive and extra-contractual damages — over nine months after the Court first addressed the issue and only five days before the trial of Plaintiff's breach of contract claim is scheduled to begin.
Rule 54(b) applies to motions for reconsideration of interlocutory judgments. McClendon v. United States, 892 F.3d 775, 781 (5th Cir. 2018); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). Under that rule, the Court may "reconsider and revise its decision for any reason it deems sufficient." McClendon, 892 F.3d at 781.
Plaintiff argues that the Court should consider whether punitive damages are appropriate after the compensatory damages phase of trial, repeating the same arguments she presented in response to Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [42].
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
Comment
User Comments