1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RANDHAWA v. INTEL CORPORATION
 

RANDHAWA v. INTEL CORPORATION

No. 2:21-cv-0054 KJM DB PS.

SONIA RANDHAWA, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

February 24, 2021.

ORDER

Plaintiff Sonia Randhawa commenced this action proceeding pro se. Accordingly, this matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, on February 23, 2021, attorney Marta Vanegas appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. (ECF No. 5.)

Because plaintiff is no longer proceeding pro se in this action, Local Rule 302(c)(21) no longer applies and the case will be referred back to the assigned District Judge. Therefore, all pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed for hearing before the District Judge assigned to this action. The assigned magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21);

2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and

3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be No. 2:21-cv-0054 KJM DB with the "PS" designation being eliminated.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases