VAPORSTREAM, INC. v. SNAP INC.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00220-MLH (KSx).

VAPORSTREAM, INC., Plaintiff, v. SNAP INC. d/b/a/Snapchat, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

January 13, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vaporstream Inc, Plaintiff, represented by Davida P. Brook , Susman Godfrey LLP, Amanda K. Bonn , Susman Godfrey LLP, Joseph S. Grinstein , Susman Godfrey LLP, pro hac vice, Meng Xi , Susman Godfrey LLP, Oleg Elkhunovich , Susman Godfrey LLP & Robert Rivera, Jr. , Susman Godfrey LLP, pro hac vice.

Snap Inc, doing business as Snapchat Inc, Defendant, represented by Heidi Lyn Keefe , Cooley LLP, Elizabeth Lee Stameshkin , Cooley LLP, Lam K. Nguyen , Cooley LLP, Lauren Joan Krickl , Cooley LLP, Mark R. Weinstein , Cooley LLP, Michael A. Attanasio , Cooley LLP & Reuben H. Chen , Cooley LLP.


ORDER:

(1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S FEBRUARY 27, 2018 SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER;

[Doc. No. 183.]

(2) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT; AND

[Doc. No. 178.]

(3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF OBVIOUSNESS BASED ON IPR ESTOPPEL

[Doc. No. 179...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases