JONES v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Civil Action No. 2:18cv517.

GEORGIA JONES, Administrator of the Estate of ARLENE DUKE, THE DECEDENT, deceased. Plaintiff, V. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division.

May 9, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Georgia Jones, Administrator of the Estate of ARLENE DUKE, THE DECEDENT, deceased, Plaintiff, represented by Ann Katherine Sullivan , Sullivan Law Group, P.L.C., Jon M. Babineau , Riddick Babineau PC, Melissa Morris Picco , Sullivan Law Group, P.L.C. & Sybil Louise Spurgeon , Sullivan Law Group, P.L.C.

Harold W Clarke, Director Virginia Department of Corrections, Frederick Schilling, Director of Health Services Virginia Department of Corrections & Tammy Brown, Individually and as Warden of Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, Defendants, represented by Ann-Marie Catherine White , Office of the Attorney General & Richard Carson Vorhis , Office of the Attorney General.

Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Dr Thomas Gable, Individually and as Medical Director of Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, Dr. Uzma Mian, MD, Individually and as Staff Physician at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, Dr. Paul C. Ohai, MD, Individually and as Staff Physician at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women & C. Hylton, LPC, Individually and as Staff Nurse at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, Defendants, represented by Elizabeth Martin Muldowney , Sands Anderson PC, Ramon Rodriguez, III , Sands Anderson PC & Ruth Thomas Griggs , Sands Anderson PC.

Dr. Sandy Gibson, Individually and as Staff Physician at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, Defendant, represented by Laura May Hooe , Moran Reeves Conn PC.

Dr. Melissa Morton-Fishman, MD, Individually and as Staff Physician at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, Defendant, represented by Eve Grandis Campbell , O'Hagan Meyer PLLC.


OPINION & ORDER

This matter comes to the Court on a Motion to Dismiss under rule 12(b)(6), filed by several Defendants. Doc. 17. The parties have agreed that a hearing is not necessary as to the Motions to Dismiss. See Doc. 40. The Court agrees that no hearing is necessary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases