O'CONNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case Nos. 13-cv-03826-EMC, 15-cv-00262-EMC

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. HAKAN YUCESOY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 29, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hakan Yucesoy, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Abdi Mahammd, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mokhtar Talha, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Brian Morris, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Pedro Sanchez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Antonio Oliveira, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, & Aaron Dulles, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, represented by Shannon Liss-Riordan , Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C. & Adelaide Pagano , Lichten and Liss-Riordan, P.C., pro hac vice.

Uber Technologies, Inc., Defendant, represented by Debra Wong Yang , Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP, Marcellus Antonio McRae , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Dhananjay Saikrishna Manthripragada , Gibson Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Joshua Seth Lipshutz , Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Peter C. Squeri , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theane Evangelis , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP & Theane D. Evangelis , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

Travis Kalanick, Defendant, represented by Dhananjay Saikrishna Manthripragada , Gibson Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Joshua Seth Lipshutz , Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Peter C. Squeri , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Theane Evangelis , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP & Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Docket No. 915

Docket No. 321

Plaintiffs brought two lawsuits against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., alleging that Uber misclassifies its drivers as independent contractors rather than employees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases