1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MYERS v. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE SEVENTY SEVEN ENERGY INC.
 

MYERS v. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE SEVENTY SEVEN ENERGY INC.

Case No. CIV-17-200-D.

KATHLEEN J. MYERS, on behalf of the Seventy Seven Energy Inc. Retirement & Savings Plan and a class of similarly situated participants of the Plan, Plaintiff, v. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, SEVENTY SEVEN ENERGY, INC. RETIREMENT & SAVINGS PLAN; et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

March 22, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen J Myers, on behalf of the Seventy Seven Energy Inc. Retirement & Savings Plan and a class of similarly situated participants of the Plan, Plaintiff, represented by Bobby L. Latham, Jr. , Latham Steele Lehman Keele Ratcliff Freije & Carter, Craig A. Raabe , Izard Kindall & Raabe LLP, Douglas P. Needham , Izard Kindall & Raabe LLP, Gregory Y. Porter , Bailey & Glasser LLP, Mark P. Kindall , Izard Kindall & Raabe LLP, Robert A. Izard , Izard Kindall & Raabe LLP & Ryan T. Jenny , Bailey & Glasser LLP.

Delaware Charter Guarantee and Trust Company, doing business as Principal Trust Company, Defendant, represented by Leasa M. Stewart , Gable & Gotwals & Mark B. Blocker , Sidley Austin.

Cary Baetz, Karl Blanchard, Christin Borden, Linda Clark, Clint Clover, Gino DeMarco, Lance Haffner & Jerome Loughridge, Defendants, represented by Spencer F. Smith , McAfee & Taft & Tina Q. Nguyen , Baker & Botts LLP.

Administrative Committee Seventy Seven Energy Inc Retirement and Savings Plan, Defendant, represented by Brandon P. Long , McAfee & Taft, Michael F. Lauderdale , McAfee & Taft, Patrick L. Stein , McAfee & Taft, Spencer F. Smith , McAfee & Taft, Tina Q. Nguyen , Baker & Botts LLP & Travis J. Sales , Baker & Botts LLP.

ORDER

Currently before the Court are the Committee Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Class Action Complaint [Doc. No. 45] and Defendant Principal Trust Company's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 46],1 filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases