MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS v. HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

No. 17 C 1973.

367 F.Supp.3d 813 (2019)

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

Signed March 19, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brandon Hugh Brown , Adam R. Alper , Pro Hac Vice, Akshay S. Deoras , Pro Hac Vice, Natalie Flechsig , Pro Hac Vice, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, San Francisco, CA, Joshua L. Simmons , Pro Hac Vice, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY, Ali-Reza Boloori , Pro Hac Vice, Benjamin Aaron Yaghoubian , Pro Hac Vice, Christopher Lawless Pro Hac Vice, Justin Singh , Pro Hac Vice, Michael W. De Vries , Pro Hac Vice, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Amir Freund , Pro Hac Vice, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Palo Alto, CA, David Rokach , Megan Margaret New , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, Joseph Kuan Liu , Pro Hac Vice, One LLP, Newport Beach, CA, for Plaintiff.

Christopher T. Blackford , Pro Hac Vice, E. Robert Yoches , Pro Hac Vice, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, John William Toth , Pro Hac Vice, Kassandra Michele Officer, Pro Hac Vice, Boyd T. Cloern , Pro Hac Vice, Jessica Ilana Rothschild , Pro Hac Vice, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Michael J. Allan , Arnold & Porter, Washington, DC, Daniel Steven Stringfield , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, John T. Schriver , William Charles Staes , Duane Morris LLC, Tron Yue Fu , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Chicago, IL, Erik Raymond Puknys , Pro Hac Vice, Jacob Adam Schroeder , Pro Hac Vice, Nicholas D. Petrella , Pro Hac Vice, Finnegan, Henerson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Joshua M. Ryland , Pro Hac Vice, Mark Wallace McDougall , Pro Hac Vice, Todd R. Tucker , Pro Hac Vice, Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, Cleveland, OH, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Motorola has filed another series of motions relating to the ongoing and contentious discovery in this case. This Order refers to three motions to seal exhibits and briefs. The motions are granted as to the filing of exhibits under seal, but denied as to the filing of briefs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases