1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BRIM v. STEVENS
 

BRIM v. STEVENS

No. 18-cv-24-jdp.

FRADARIO BRIM, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER STEVENS, JAY VAN LANEN, WILLIAM SWIEKATOWSKI, JOHN KIND, SCOTT ECKSTEIN, CATHY FRANCOIS, and AMY ZIRBEL, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

March 1, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 555 Prisoner (Prison Condition)
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fradario Brim, Plaintiff, pro se.

Christopher Stevens, Jay Van Lanen, William Swiekatowski, John Kind, Security Director, Scott Eckstein, Cathy Francois & Amy Zirbel, Defendants, represented by Rebecca Ann Paulson , Department of Justice.

OPINION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Fradario Brim brings claims under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments based on allegations of retaliation by prison officials. Defendants have filed a motion for partial summary judgment, contending that Brim did not exhaust his administrative remedies on some...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases