1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 351 F.Supp.3d
  5. 351 F.Supp.3d 1141 (2018)
 

ACCESS LIVING OF METROPOLITAN v. UBER TECH.

No. 16 CV 9690.

351 F.Supp.3d 1141 (2018)

ACCESS LIVING OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Rasier, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

Signed December 17, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nature of Suit: 446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven P. Blonder, Daniel Adam Hantman, Jonathan L. Loew, Much Shelist, P.C., Charles Robert Petrof, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

James J. Oh, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Chicago, IL, Anne Marie Estevez, Pro Hac Vice, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Miami, FL, Clara Kollm, Patrick A. Harvey, Stephanie Schuster, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Llp, Washington, DC, Kristal Dora Petrovich, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius Llp, Todd M. Church, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Chicago II, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs are people with disabilities who use motorized wheelchairs and Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago, a non-profit organization that advocates for people with disabilities. They claim Uber is violating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases