1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CITY OF PONTIAC RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. SCHIMMEL
 

CITY OF PONTIAC RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. SCHIMMEL

Case No. 12-12830.

THE CITY OF PONTIAC RETIRED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, DELMER ANDERSON, JOHN CLAYA, THOMAS HUNTER, HENRY C. SHOEMAKER, YVETTE TALLEY and DEBRA WOODS, Plaintiffs, v. LOUIS SCHIMMEL, INDIVIDUALLY HON. AVERN COHN AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS EMERGENCY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC, CATHY SQUARE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND LABOR RELATIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC AND THE CITY OF PONTIAC, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

November 19, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CITY OF PONTIAC RETIRED EMPLOYEES, Delmer Anderson, Thomas Hunter, Henry C Shoemaker, Yvette Talley & Debra Woods, Plaintiffs, represented by Alec S. Gibbs , Law Offices of Gregory T. Gibbs & Gregory T. Gibbs , Gregory T. Gibbs Assoc.

JOHN CLAYA, Plaintiff, represented by Alec S. Gibbs , Law Offices of Gregory T. Gibbs.

Louis Schimmel, Defendant, represented by John C. Clark , Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C., Richard W. Warren , Miller, Canfield & Stephen J. Hitchcock , Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C.

City of Pontiac, Defendant, represented by Brian M. Schwartz , Miller, Canfield, John C. Clark , Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C., Michael A. Alaimo , Miller, Canfield, Richard W. Warren , Miller, Canfield & Stephen J. Hitchcock , Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C.

Pearl Barefoot, Objector, pro se.

Floyd Baker, Objector, pro se.

Edward Pilchowski, Objector, pro se.

Joseph Solenika, Objector, pro se.

Pontiac General Hospital Retirees, Intervenor, represented by Marie T. Racine , Racine & Associates.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' AND DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT (Doc. 78) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES (Doc. 79) AND OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO SETTLEMENT (Docs. 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 86, 91, 93)

I. Introduction

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases