1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HURLEY v. MESSER
 

HURLEY v. MESSER

Civil Action No. 3:16-9949.

JOANN HURLEY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THOMAS MESSER, a W.Va. citizen, SANDRA PERTEE, a W. Va. citizen, WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a West Virginia Political Subdivision, RINGCENTRAL, INC., a Delaware Corp., CALLCENTRIC, INC., a New York Corp., AND VOICENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a California Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division.

October 10, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joann Hurley, on behalf of herself, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony J. Majestro , POWELL & MAJESTRO, J. Ryan Stewart , BUCCI JAVINS & CARTER & Timothy C. Bailey , BAILEY JAVINS & CARTER.

Wayne County Board of Education, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Bernard S. Vallejos , FARRELL FARRELL & FARRELL & Michael J. Farrell , FARRELL WHITE & LEGG.

Thomas Messer, a W.Va. citizen, Defendant, pro se.

Sandra Pertee, a W. Va. citizen & Wayne County Board of Education, a West Virginia Political Subdivision, Defendants, represented by Bernard S. Vallejos , FARRELL FARRELL & FARRELL & Michael J. Farrell , FARRELL WHITE & LEGG.

Ringcentral, Inc., a Delaware Corp., Defendant, represented by Edward P. Tiffey , TIFFEY LAW PRACTICE & Mary Ann L. Wymore , GREENSFELDER HEMKER & GALE, pro hac vice.

Callcentric, Inc., a New York Corp., Defendant, represented by Michael P. Donahue , MARASHLIAN & DONAHUE, Robert R. Rodecker & John R. McGhee, Jr. , KAY CASTO & CHANEY.

Voicent Communications, Inc., a California Corp., Defendant, represented by Jared M. Tully , FROST BROWN TODD, Jeffrey A. Backman , GREENSPOON MARDER & Lauren Shoemake , GREENSPOON MARDER.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Voicent Communications, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 102. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES, in part, and GRANTS, in part, Voicent's motion.

I. Background and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases