1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FARRIS v. 3M COMPANY
 

FARRIS v. 3M COMPANY

Case No. 3:18-cv-04186-JST.

GARY FARRIS and MELVA FARRIS, Plaintiffs, v. 3M COMPANY, et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

September 24, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 368 P.I. : Asbestos
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Farris & Melva Farris, Plaintiffs, represented by Trey Jones , Law Offices of H.W. Trey Jones.

Carrier Corporation, Defendant, represented by James P. Cunningham , Tucker Ellis LLP & Ronald Q. Tran , Tucker Ellis LLP.

Crane Co., Defendant, represented by Peter Edward Soskin , K&L Gates LLP & Geoffrey M. Davis , K&L Gates LLP.

General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Derek S. Johnson , WFBM, LLP, Charles T. Sheldon , WFBM, LLP, Emily Elizabeth Anselmo , WFBM, LLP & Katherine Paige Gardiner , WFBM, LLP.

IMO Industries, Inc., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., Defendant, represented by Bobbie Rae Bailey , Leader & Berkon LLP, Frederick W. Gatt , Leader & Berkon LLP & Olga Guadalupe Pena , Leader & Berkon LLP.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Sacoma-Sierra Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert Kum , Duane Morris LLP & Christopher Sean Patterson , Duane Morris LLP.

Ricoh Company, LTD. & RICOH COMPANY, LTD. (erroneously sued and served as "RICOH COMPANY LTD. (individually and as successor-in-interest to SAVIN CORPORATION and served through its General Manager, RICOH USA, INC.)&qu, Defendants, represented by Mary Katherine Back , Manion Gaynor & Manning LLP & Tina Broccardo Van Dam , Manning Gross & Massenburg LLP.

RICOH USA, INC. & RICOH USA, Inc. (erroneously sued and served as "RICOH USA, INC. (individually and as successor-in-interest to SAVIN CORPORATION and as general manager of RICOH COMPANY, LTD.)"), Defendants, represented by Mary Katherine Back , Manion Gaynor & Manning LLP.

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., AND SPECIALLY APPEARING PARTY TOSHIBA CORPORATION, AND TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs GARY FARRIS and MELVA FARRIS ("Plaintiffs") filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases