1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. IN RE M&T BANK CORPORATION ERISA LITIGATION
 

IN RE M&T BANK CORPORATION ERISA LITIGATION

Case No. 16-CV-375 FPG.

In re M&T Bank Corporation ERISA Litigation.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

September 11, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

In re M&T Bank Corporation ERISA Litigation, Plaintiff, represented by Lucinda Odell Lapoff , Trevett, Cristo, Salzer & Andolina P.C. & Mark K. Gyandoh , Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, pro hac vice.

Sa'ud Habib, Beverly Williams, J. Marlene Smith, Kenneth Sliwinski & Russ Dixon, individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, and on behalf of the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, Plaintiffs, represented by Carl F. Engstrom , Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Jacob T. Schutz , Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Kai H. Richter , Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Mark K. Gyandoh , Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP & Lucinda Odell Lapoff , Trevett, Cristo, Salzer & Andolina P.C.

Jacqueline Allen, Consol Plaintiff, represented by Lucinda Odell Lapoff , Trevett, Cristo, Salzer & Andolina P.C. & Mark K. Gyandoh , Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, pro hac vice.

M&T Bank Corporation, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, M&T Bank Employee Benefit Plans Committee, Wilmington Trust Investment Advisors, Wilmington Funds Management Corporation, Janet Coletti, Michele Trolli, Mark Czarnecki, Stephen Braunscheidel, Brian Hickey, Kevin Pearson, Michael Spychala, Brent O. Baird, C. Angela Bontempo, Robert T. Brady, T. Jefferson Cunningham, III, Gary N. Geisel, John D. Hawks, Jr., Patrick W.E. Hodgson, Richard G. King, Melinda R. Rich, Robert E. Sadler, Jr., Herbert L. Washington, Robert G. Wilmers, Robert J. Bennett, Michael D. Buckley, Jorge Pereira, Colin E. Doherty, Denis J. Salamon, Newton P.S. Merrill & Darren King, Defendants, represented by Richard C. Pepperman, II , Sullivan & Cromwell, Jonathan Joseph Ossip , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, M. David Possick , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Matthew A. Schwartz , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP & Maya Krugman , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.

Wilmington Trust Corporation, Defendant, represented by Richard C. Pepperman, II , Sullivan & Cromwell, M. David Possick , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP & Matthew A. Schwartz , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.

John Does 1-20, Defendant, represented by Richard C. Pepperman, II , Sullivan & Cromwell.

Edward Amoroso & Richard A. Grossi, Defendants, represented by Jonathan Joseph Ossip , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Matthew A. Schwartz , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Maya Krugman , Sullivan & Cromwell LLP & Richard C. Pepperman, II , Sullivan & Cromwell.

DECISION AND ORDER

INTRODUCTION

This is a putative class action brought under the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") by Plaintiffs Sa'ud Habib, Beverly Williams, J. Marlene Smith, Kenneth Sliwinski, and Russ Dixon, all of whom are current or former employees of M&...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases