1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 323 F.Supp.3d
  5. 323 F.Supp.3d 220 (2018)
 

JAY v. SIEMENS AG

Civil Action No. 18-10267-RWZ.

323 F.Supp.3d 220 (2018)

Andrew JAY v. SIEMENS AG, Siemens Financial Services, Inc., Siemens Healthineers and Siemens Next 47 GmbH.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Signed August 30, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Employment Discrimination
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kristen S. Scammon, Torres, Scammon & Day, LLP, Brooks L. Glahn, Adler, Cohen, Harvey, Wakeman & Guekguezian LLP, Boston, MA, for Andrew Jay.

Nipun J. Patel, Sara A. Begley, Reed Smith LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Bronwyn L. Roberts, Duane Morris LLP, Boston, MA, for Siemens AG, Siemens Financial Services, Inc., Siemens Healthineers and Siemens Next 47 GmbH.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Andrew Jay, formerly an at-will employee of defendants, alleges wrongful constructive discharge in retaliation for his internal report of extortion. Defendants move to dismiss his single-count complaint.

I. Factual Background

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases