FEINBERG v. T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC.

Civil Action No. MJG-17-0427.

DAVID G. FEINBERG, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

August 20, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David G. Feinberg, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Mikael Sebastian Neville , Mctigue Law, LLP, James Brian McTigue , McTigue Law LLP, pro hac vice, James A. Moore , McTigue Law LLP, pro hac vice, Jamie Bowers , Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll PLLC, pro hac vice, Karen L. Handorf , Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll PLLC, pro hac vice & Scott Michael Lempert , Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll PLLC, pro hac vice.

James Collins, Michelle Bourque, Farrah Qureshi, Sital Jani, Daniel Newman, Thomas Henry, Regina Widderich, Daniel Fialkoff, Jitesh Jani & Maria Stanton, Plaintiffs, represented by Scott Michael Lempert , Cohen Milstein Sellers and Toll PLLC & Mikael Sebastian Neville , Mctigue Law, LLP.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc, T. Rowe Price Trust Company, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Management Committee, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Management Compensation Committee, Christopher D. Alderson, Edward C. Bernard, Michael C. Gitlin, James A. C. Kennedy, John D. Linehan, Brian C. Rogers, William J. Stromberg, Eric L. Veiel & Edward A. Wiese, Defendants, represented by Brian D. Boyle , O'Melveny and Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Deanna M. Rice , O'Melveny and Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Gregory F. Jacob , O Melveny & Myers LLP & Shannon Barrett , OMelveny and Myers LLP.

T. Rowe Price U.S. Retirement Program Trustee Does 1-40 & Does 1-30, Defendants, represented by Brian D. Boyle , O'Melveny and Myers LLP, pro hac vice & Deanna M. Rice , O'Melveny and Myers LLP, pro hac vice.


MEMORANDUM

The Court has before it Defendants T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. et al's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 35], Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Exhibits 1 to 15 Attached to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 38], and the materials relating thereto submitted by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases