IN THE MATTER OF TARA CROSBY, LLC

Civil Action No. 17-05391.

IN THE MATTER OF TARA CROSBY, LLC, SECTION: "I" (4).

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

June 18, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 46 U.S.C. § 30504
Cause: 46 U.S.C. § 30504 Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Nature of Suit: 380 Personal Property: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tara Crosby LLC, as owners and owners pro hac vice of the M/V Crosby Commander, her cargo, engines, tackle, gear, appurtenances, etc. in rem & Crosby Tugs LLC, as owners and owners pro hac vice of the M/V Crosby Commander, her cargo, engines, tackle, gear, appurtenances, etc. in rem, Petitioners, represented by Miles Paul Clements , Frilot L.L.C., Brandon Kyle Thibodeaux , Frilot L.L.C. & Joseph E. Lee, III , Frilot L.L.C.

Robert Pitre & Joseph Hebert, Claimants, represented by Bobby J. Delise , Delise & Hall, Alton Jerold Hall, Jr. , Delise & Hall, Eric Jason Allen , Zehl & Associates, PC, pro hac vice, Kevin C. Haynes , Zehl & Associates & Matt L. Martin , Zehl & Associates, pro hac vice.

Linda Bryant, as Administrator of the Succession of, David Coltrin, Decedent, Claimant, represented by Bobby J. Delise , Delise & Hall, Alton Jerold Hall, Jr. , Delise & Hall, Eric Jason Allen , Zehl & Associates, PC, pro hac vice & Kevin C. Haynes , Zehl & Associates.

Robert Pitre & Joseph Hebert, Third Party Plaintiffs, represented by Bobby J. Delise , Delise & Hall, Alton Jerold Hall, Jr. , Delise & Hall, Eric Jason Allen , Zehl & Associates, PC, Kevin C. Haynes , Zehl & Associates & Matt L. Martin , Zehl & Associates, pro hac vice.

Tetra Technologies, Inc., Third Party Defendant, represented by Jennifer E. Michel , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Dakota Kyle Chenevert , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP & Joseph Patrick Tynan , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP.


ORDER

Before the Court is a Petitioners Crosby Tugs, LLC and Tara Crosby, LLC's Motion to Quash and/or Postpone Depositions of Kurt Crosby and Ivy Danos (R. Doc. 71). No opposition was timely filed, however, the Court heard oral argument on May 30, 2018.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases