ERIK MATTSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.; NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC.; VISION QUEST LENDING; and UNITED MORTGAGE, CORP., Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 22, 2018.
May 22, 2018.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Erik Mattson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory K. Zeuthen , Gregory K. Zeuthen, Attorney at Law PC, Jarrett L. Ellzey , Hughes Ellzey LLP, pro hac vice & John P. Kristensen , Kristensen Weisberg, LLP, pro hac vice.
Vision Quest Lending, Defendant, represented by Joshua M. Sasaki , Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP & Nicholas H. Pyle , Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP.
United Mortgage Corp., Defendant, represented by Robert E. Sabido , Cosgrave Vergeer Kester, LLP.
OPINION AND ORDER
YOULEE YIM YOU, Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Erik Mattson ("Mattson") brings this putative class action against Quicken Loans, Inc. ("Quicken Loans"), New Penn Financial, LLC ("New Penn"), Vision Quest Lending ("Vision Quest"), and United Mortgage, Corp. ("United") for violations of the Telephone...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.