HOLOGRAM USA, INC. v. PULSE EVOLUTION CORPORATION

Case No. 2:14-cv-00772-GMN-NJK.

HOLOGRAM USA, INC; ANAKANDO LIMITED; and UWE MAASS, Plaintiffs, v. PULSE EVOLUTION CORPORATION; PULSE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION; JOHN C. TEXTOR; DICK CLARK PRODUCTIONS, INC.; JOHN BRANCA and JOHN McCLAIN; MJJ PRODUCTIONS, INC.; MUSION EVENTS LTD.; MUSION 3D LTD.; WILLIAM JAMES ROCK; IAN CHRISTOPHER O'CONNELL; and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. IAN CHRISTOPHER O'CONNELL; MUSION EVENTS LTD.; and MUSION 3D LTD., Counterclaimants, v. HOLOGRAM USA, INC.; ANAKANDO LIMITED; and UWE MAASS, Counter-Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

April 25, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hologram USA, Inc., Uwe Maass & MDH Hologram Limited, Plaintiffs, represented by Ryan G. Baker , Baker Marquart LLP, pro hac vice & Craig A. Newby , McDonald Carano Wilson LLP.

Ian C. O'Connell, Defendant, pro se.

Ian C. O'Connell, Defendant, represented by Martin L. Welsh , Law Office of Hayes & Welsh.

Musion 3D Ltd. & Musion Events Ltd., Defendants, represented by Eric Carsten , Carsten Law PC & Martin L. Welsh , Law Office of Hayes & Welsh.

Ryan Baker, Defendant, pro se.

Musion IP Ltd. & Holicom Film Ltd., Counter Claimants, represented by Trevor Coddington , San Diego IP Law Group, LLC, pro hac vice, Martin L. Welsh , Law Office of Hayes & Welsh & James V. Fazio, III , San Diego IP Law Group LLP.

Ian C. O'Connell, Counter Claimant, represented by Martin L. Welsh , Law Office of Hayes & Welsh.

Musion 3D Ltd. & Musion Events Ltd., Counter Claimants, represented by Eric Carsten , Carsten Law PC, pro hac vice & Martin L. Welsh , Law Office of Hayes & Welsh.

Hologram USA, Inc., Uwe Maass & MDH Hologram Limited, Counter Defendants, represented by Ryan G. Baker , Baker Marquart LLP, pro hac vice, Craig A. Newby , McDonald Carano Wilson LLP & Ryan G. Baker , Baker Marquart LLP.


JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF Civil PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

Plaintiffs and counter-defendants Hologram USA, Inc. ("Hologram USA"), Anakando Limited ("Anakando") and Uwe Maass ("Maass") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and defendants and counterclaimants Ian Christopher...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases