CROSBY v. TWITTER, INC.

Case No. 16-14406.

EARL CROSBY, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF TEVIN EUGENE CROSBY, LISA CROSBY, SHENETRA PARKER-HARRIS, CHAVIS CROSBY, CELIA RUIZ, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF JUAN RAMON GUERRERO, JR., JUAN RAMON GUERRERO, MAYA GUERRERO, ARYAM GUERRERO, OSVALDO VAZQUEZ, YAZMIN REYES, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF JAVIER JORGE-REYES, PEDRO JORGE DIAZ, IRIS REYES SANTIAGO, PEDRO JORGE REYES, GABRIEL JORGE REYES, and LIZ M. JORGE-REYES, CHRIS LITTLESTAR, MARIA C. SANFELIZ-MENDOZA, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH SANFELIZ, NICHOLAS PEREZ, ANGEL MENDEZ, CHRISTINE LEINONEN, individually and as Successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER LEINONEN, JILLIAN AMADOR, STANLEY ALMODOVAR, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF STANLEY ALMODOVAR, III, ASAEL ABAD, LYDIA PEREZ, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF JEAN CARLOS MENDEZ PEREZ, ALVIN MENDEZ, JOSE LUIS VIELMA, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF LUIS SERGIO VIELMA, JACKSON J. JOSAPHAT, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF JASON B. JOSAPHAT, and CARLOS SANFELIZ, individually and as successor-in-interest of the ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH SANFELIZ, Plaintiffs, v. TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, INC., and FACEBOOK, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

March 30, 2018.

Editors Note
Cause: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl Crosby, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Tevin Eugene Crosby, The Estate of Tevin Eugene Crosby, Lisa Crosby, Shenetra Parker-Harris, Chavis Crosby, Celia Ruiz, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Juan Ramon Guerrero, Jr., The Estate of Juan Ramon Guerrero, Jr., Juan Ramon Guerrero, Maya Guerrero, Aryam Guerrero, Osvaldo Vazquez, Yazmin Reyes, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Javier Jorge-Reyes, The Estate of Javier Jorge-Reyes, Pedro Jorge Diaz, Iris Reyes Santiago, Pedro Jorge Reyes, Gabriel Jorge Reyes & Liz M. Jorge-Reyes, Plaintiffs, represented by Ari Kresch , 1-800-LAW-FIRM, Solomon M. Radner , EXCOLO LAW, PLLC & Keith L. Altman , Excolo Law PLLC.

Chris Littlestar, The Estate of Jason B. Josaphat, The Estate of Jean Carlos Mendez Perez, Maria C. Sanfeliz-Mendoza, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Christopher Joseph Sanfeliz, Nicholaz Perez, Angel Mendez, Christine Leinonen, Individually and as Proposed Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Christopher Leinonen, The Estate of Christopher Leinonen, The Estate of Stanley Almodovar, III, Jillian Amador, Stanley Almodovar, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Stanley Almodovar, III, Asael Abad, The Estate of Luis Sergio Vielma, Lydia Perez, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Jean Carlos Mendez Perez, Alvin Mendez, Jose Luis Vielma, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Luis Sergio Vielma, The Estate of Christopher Joseph Sanfeliz, Jackson J. Josaphat, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Jason B. Josaphat & Carlos Sanfeliz, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest of the Estate of Christopher Joseph Sanfeliz, Plaintiffs, represented by Keith L. Altman , Excolo Law PLLC.

Twitter, Inc., Defendant, represented by J. Michael Huget , Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Leonard M. Niehoff , Patrick J. Carome , Wilmer Culter Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP & Seth P. Waxman , Miller, Cassidy.

Facebook, Inc., Defendant, represented by David D. O'Brien , Miller, Canfield, Jeana Marie Bisnar Maute , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Kristin A. Linsley , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Sheli R. Chabon , Gibson Dunn & Crutcher & Thomas W. Cranmer , Miller Canfield Paddock and Stone PLC.

Google, LLC, Defendant, represented by Brian Michael Willen , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC.


OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

The plaintiffs in this case are victims and family members of deceased victims of the mass...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases