TATNEFT v. UKRAINE

Civil Action No. 17-582 (CKK).

301 F.Supp.3d 175 (2018)

Pao TATNEFT, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. UKRAINE, Respondent/Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Signed March 19, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Cause: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Nature of Suit: 896 Arbitration
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan I. Blackman , Pro Hac Vice, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, LLP, New York, NY, Matthew David Slater , Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner/Plaintiff.

Thomas M. Buchanan , Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, Maria Kostytska , Winston & Strawn LLP, France, for Respondent/Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court on review of an arbitration award pursuant to the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards ("New York Convention" or "Convention") and its implementing legislation, 9 U.S.C. §§ 201-208...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases