1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PEERLESS NETWORK, INC. v. MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
 

PEERLESS NETWORK, INC. v. MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.

No. 14 C 7417.

PEERLESS NETWORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants, v. MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., and VERIZON SELECT SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

March 16, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peerless Network, Inc., Peerless Network of Arkansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Arizona, LLC, Peerless Network of California, LLC, Peerless Network of Colorado, LLC, Peerless Network of Connecticut, LLC, Peerless Network of Delaware, LLC, Peerless Network of the District of Columbia, LLC, Peerless Network of Florida, LLC, Peerless Network of Georgia, LLC, Peerless Network of Illinois, LLC, Peerless Network of Indiana, LLC, Peerless Network of Kansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Kentucky, LLC, Peerless Network of Louisiana, LLC, Peerless Network of Maine, LLC, Peerless Network of Maryland, LLC, Peerless Network of Massachusetts, LLC, Peerless Network of Michigan, LLC, Peerless Network of Minnesota, LLC, Peerless Network of Missouri, LLC, Peerless Network of Nevada, LLC, Peerless Network of New Hampshire, LLC, Peerless Network of New Jersey, LLC, Peerless Network of New York, LLC, Peerless Network of North Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Ohio, LLC, Peerless Network of Oklahoma, LLC, Peerless Network of Oregon, LLC, Peerless Network of Pennsylvania, LLC, Peerless Network of Rhode Island, LLC, Peerless Network of South Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Tennessee, LLC, Peerless Network of Texas, LLC, Peerless Network of Utah, LLC, Peerless Network of Vermont, LLC, Peerless Network of Virginia, LLC, Peerless Network of Washington, LLC & Peerless Network of Wisconsin, LLC, Plaintiffs, represented by Henry T. Kelly , Kelley, Drye & Warren, Catherine E. James , Kelley Drye & Warren LLP & Michael Ryan Dover , Kelley Drye & Warren LLP.

MCI Communications Services, Inc., Verizon Services Corp. & Verizon Select Services Inc., Defendants, represented by Scott Harris Angstreich , Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice, Joshua Hafenbrack , Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice, Kevin J. Miller , Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice & Nancy Anne Temple , Katten & Temple, LLP.

MCI Communications Services, Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc. & Verizon Services Corp., Counter Claimants, represented by Scott Harris Angstreich , Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice, Joshua Hafenbrack , Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice, Kevin J. Miller , Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice & Nancy Anne Temple , Katten & Temple, LLP.

Peerless Network of Arizona, LLC, Peerless Network of Arkansas, LLC, Peerless Network of California, LLC, Peerless Network of Colorado, LLC, Peerless Network of Connecticut, LLC, Peerless Network of Delaware, LLC, Peerless Network of Florida, LLC, Peerless Network of Georgia, LLC, Peerless Network of Illinois, LLC, Peerless Network of Indiana, LLC, Peerless Network of Kansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Kentucky, LLC, Peerless Network of Louisiana, LLC, Peerless Network of Maine, LLC, Peerless Network of Maryland, LLC, Peerless Network of Massachusetts, LLC, Peerless Network of Michigan, LLC, Peerless Network of Minnesota, LLC, Peerless Network of Missouri, LLC, Peerless Network of Nevada, LLC, Peerless Network of New Hampshire, LLC, Peerless Network of New Jersey, LLC, Peerless Network of New York, LLC, Peerless Network of North Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Ohio, LLC, Peerless Network of Oklahoma, LLC, Peerless Network of Oregon, LLC, Peerless Network of Pennsylvania, LLC, Peerless Network of Rhode Island, LLC, Peerless Network of South Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Tennessee, LLC, Peerless Network of Texas, LLC, Peerless Network of Utah, LLC, Peerless Network of Vermont, LLC, Peerless Network of Virginia, LLC, Peerless Network of Washington, LLC, Peerless Network of Wisconsin, LLC, Peerless Network of the District of Columbia, LLC & Peerless Network, Inc., Counter Defendants, represented by Henry T. Kelly , Kelley, Drye & Warren, Catherine E. James , Kelley Drye & Warren LLP & Michael Ryan Dover , Kelley Drye & Warren LLP.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter presents a billing dispute between two telecommunications companies. On September 23, 2014, Peerless Network, Inc. and its subsidiaries1 brought suit to recover amounts allegedly owed by Verizon2 for telephone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases