COX v. AGCO CORPORATION

Civil Action Case No. 4:16-cv-00084-D.

JACK HOWARD COX, SR., Executor of the Estate of PERCY RAY COX, Plaintiff, v. AGCO CORPORATION, et al, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Greenville Division.

December 27, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Asbestos Litigation
Nature of Suit: 368 P.I. : Asbestos
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Executor of the Estate of Percy Ray Cox, Dec., Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin D. Braly , Dean Omar Branham LLP, Sabrina G. Stone , Dean Omar Branham LLP & Janet Ward Black , Ward Black Law.

AGCO Corporation, Defendant, represented by Kelly Street Brown , Young, Moore & Henderson, P.A. & Joseph W. Williford , Young, Moore & Henderson, P.A.

Arvinmeritor, successor in interest to Rockwell International Automotive Products & Maremont Corporation, Defendants, represented by Carter T. Lambeth , Carter T. Lambeth Attorney, P.C. & William P. Early , Pierce Herns Sloan and Wilson LLC.

Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc., successor in interest to Borg-Warner Corporation, Defendant, represented by David L. Levy , Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP & Jon S. Player , Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP.

Caterpillar, Inc., Defendant, represented by Charles M. Sprinkle, III , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A., Moffatt G. McDonald , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A., Scott E. Frick , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. & William David Conner , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.

Cummins, Inc., Defendant, represented by Erin Elaine Shofner , Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young, Teresa Elizabeth Lazzaroni , Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP & Douglas Andrew Rubel , Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP.

Deere & Company, Inc., doing business as John Deere, Defendant, represented by Tracy E. Tomlin , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Travis Andrew Bustamante , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP & William Michael Starr , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP.

FMC Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Barrett Equipment Company, Defendant, represented by Gary L. Beaver , Nexsen Pruet, PLLC & Peter A. Santos , Nexsen Pruet, PLLC.

Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Christopher R. Kiger , Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP, Kirk G. Warner , Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP & Addie K.S. Ries , Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP.

Honeywell International, Inc., individually and as successor in interest to the Bendix Corporation formerly known as AlliedSignal, Inc., Defendant, represented by H. Lee Davis, Jr. , Davis & Hamrick, LLP.

Meadwestvaco Corporation, formerly known as Westvaco, Defendant, represented by Carter T. Lambeth , Carter T. Lambeth Attorney, P.C. & Louis P. Herns , Pierce Herns Sloan and Wilson LLC.

Navistar, Inc., successor in interest to International Harvester Company formerly known as International Truck and Engine Corporation, Defendant, represented by Robert O. Meriwether , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, Tracy E. Tomlin , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Travis Andrew Bustamante , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP & William Michael Starr , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation & Standard Motor Products, Inc., Defendants, represented by Robert David Proffitt , Proffitt & Cox, LLP & Ronald Brian Cox , Proffitt & Cox, LLP.

Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation, Defendant, represented by Timothy W. Bouch , Leath Bouch & Seekings.

SPX Corporation, Individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company, Defendant, represented by Gary L. Beaver , Nexsen Pruet, PLLC.

Dana Companies, LLC, Defendant, represented by Scott E. Frick , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.

Federal-Mogul Asbestos Personal Injury Trust, Defendant, represented by Keith E. Coltrain , Wall Templeton & Haldrup, P.A.

Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc., Defendant, represented by Patrick James Cleary , Bowman and Brooke, LLP.


THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Dismiss Defendant METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

For the reasons stated in the Joint Motion, and for cause shown,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Joint Motion is GRANTED, and the claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases