LINLOR v. Five9, INC.

Case No. 17cv218-MMA (BLM).

JAMES LINLOR, Plaintiff, v. FIVE9, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

November 29, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 0227(b)(3)
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 0227(b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Linlor, Plaintiff, Pro Se.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Doc. No. 29]

On February 3, 2017, Defendant Five9, Inc. ("Five9") removed this action from the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. See Doc. No. 1. In the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC")...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases