Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
John Barker, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin I. Fink , Berman Fink Van Horn P.C., pro hac vice.
John Barker, Plaintiff, represented by Tyler Mark Paetkau , Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP.
Insight Global, LLC, Defendant, represented by Christopher Carl Marquardt , Alston Bird LLP, Jeremy Matthew Mittman , Proskauer Rose LLP, Anna Beth Saraie , Alston and Bird LLP, pro hac vice & Isabella Pei-Ying Lee , Alston and Bird LLP Labor and Employment, pro hac vice.
Insight Global, LLC 2013 Incentive Unit Plan, Defendant, represented by Christopher Carl Marquardt , Alston Bird LLP, Isabella Pei-Ying Lee , Alston and Bird LLP Labor and Employment, Jeremy Matthew Mittman , Proskauer Rose LLP & Tyler Mark Paetkau , Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP.
Insight Global, LLC, Counter-claimant, represented by Christopher Carl Marquardt , Alston Bird LLP, Jeremy Matthew Mittman , Proskauer Rose LLP, Anna Beth Saraie , Alston and Bird LLP, pro hac vice & Isabella Pei-Ying Lee , Alston and Bird LLP Labor and Employment, pro hac vice.
John Barker, Counter-defendant, represented by Benjamin I. Fink , Berman Fink Van Horn P.C., pro hac vice, Charles John Smith, III , Law Offices of Charles J. Smith III, Olga Savage , Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP & Tyler Mark Paetkau , Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP.
Insight Global, LLC, Counter-claimant, represented by Christopher Carl Marquardt , Alston Bird LLP, Jeremy Matthew Mittman , Proskauer Rose LLP, Anna Beth Saraie , Alston and Bird LLP, pro hac vice & Isabella Pei-Ying Lee , Alston and Bird LLP Labor and Employment.
John Barker, Counter-defendant, represented by Benjamin I. Fink , Berman Fink Van Horn P.C., pro hac vice, Charles John Smith, III , Law Offices of Charles J. Smith III, Olga Savage , Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP & Tyler Mark Paetkau , Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP.
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE JOINT REPORT NO. 7
Re: Dkt. Nos. 117, 120
HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
In Discovery Dispute Joint Report #7, the plaintiff challenges the defendant's designation of certain of its discovery responses as "Attorneys' Eyes Only" ("AEO"). Defendant argues that the AEO designation is correct.
...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.
GET STARTED
OR
