JOHNSON v. COMPASS GROUP, USA, INC.

Case No. 4:17-cv-03543-KAW.

GERALD JOHNSON, MAISHA GROCHOWSKI, STEVEN AGUILAR, and HECTOR PORTILLO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. COMPASS GROUP, USA, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

October 13, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - (Citizenship)
Nature of Suit: 790 Labor: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Maisha Grochowski, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Steven Aguilar, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Hector Portillo, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew B. George , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP.

Compass Group, USA, Inc., Defendant, represented by Sean Francis Daley , Fisher & Phillips LLP.


JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL CIVIL RULE 41(a)(2) WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiffs Gerald Johnson, Maisha Grochowski, Steven Aguilar, and Hector Portillo, and Defendant Compass Group, Inc., by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate to and jointly request the Court dismiss the instant matter with prejudice based on the following facts below:.

Procedural History and Prior Extensions.

Plaintiffs are former employees of Defendant who filed this action on June 20, 2017 (ECF No. 1) as a putative class action alleging various violations of the California Labor Code, including the failure to provide meal and rest breaks and pay minimum wages and overtime. Plaintiffs' Complaint was served on June 26, 2017. Shortly thereafter counsel for Defendant alerted Plaintiffs to a related case pending in the Superior Court of Riverside County, California, Romero, et al., v. Compass Group, USA, Inc., Case No. CIVDS1512026 (the "Romero Action"). ECF No. 7.

A class action settlement was preliminarily approved in the Romero Action after Plaintiffs' Complaint was filed in which Plaintiffs are all putative class members. Plaintiffs received their class notices and elected not to opt-out of the Agreement in the Romero Action. Final approval of the class action settlement agreement in the Romero Action was ordered by the San Bernardino Superior Court on Tuesday October 3, 2017. The claims released in the Romero Action overlap all class claims made by Plaintiffs in the subject litigation.

The Parties have agreed that the subject litigation may be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) with prejudice with the parties to bear their own fees and costs.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

The subject litigation is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Court directs the Clerk to close the case file.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases