Civil Action No. 15-2198-KHV.

EMERALD LENGEL, on behalf of herself and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HOMEADVISOR, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

September 25, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emerald Lengel, Plaintiff, represented by Kai H. Richter , Nichols Kaster, PLLP, pro hac vice.

Emerald Lengel, Plaintiff, represented by Mark A. Kistler , Brady & Associates Law Office & Michael F. Brady , Brady & Associates Law Office.

HomeAdvisor, Inc., Defendant, represented by Alexander C. Clayden , Lathrop Gage, LLP, Mark A. Samsel , Lathrop & Gage, LLP & Stephen J. Horace , Lathrop Gage, LLP, pro hac vice.

Frederick Banks, Movant, Pro Se.


On August 10, 2017, intervenor Frederick Banks filed a Notice (Motion) To Intervene As Of Right (Fed R. Civ. P. 24) And Claim (Doc. #74). Intervenor asserts that he has a legally protectable interest in this action and requests that he receive settlement funds.

Under Rule 24(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., the Court must allow a party to intervene if (1) his application is timely; (2) he claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action; (3) his interest may as a practical matter be impaired or impeded and (4) his interest is not adequately represented by existing parties. See Elliot Indus. Ltd. P'ship v. BP Am. Prod. Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1103 (10th Cir. 2005).1

Intervenor fails to allege a sufficient factual basis to establish a legal interest in this action. In this class action suit, plaintiffs allege that HomeAdvisor, Inc. violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act because it failed to give job applicants proper notice before it obtained consumer reports that contained personal information. The putative intervenor's notice does not claim that he worked for or applied for a job with HomeAdvisor between January 13, 2013 and June 10, 2015 — the class period. The Court rejects his unsupported, conclusory claim that "he has a legally protectable interest in this action." Doc. #74. Further, the notice does not attempt to establish that any interest will be impaired or impeded by this action or that the existing parties do not adequately represent his interest. Thus, the Court strikes the notice to intervene.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that intervenor's Notice (Motion) To Intervene As Of Right (Fed R, Civ. P. 24) And Claim (Doc. #74) filed August 10, 2017 be and hereby is STRICKEN.


1. Intervenor seeks "intervention as of right." Doc. #74. Thus, the Court does not need to consider whether it would grant permissive intervention under Rule 24(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. Nevertheless, the Court denies permissive intervention because intervenor has not established that he has an interest in this action.


1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases