COX v. AGCO CORPORATION

No. 4:16-cv-00084-D.

JACK HOWARD COX, SR., Executor of the Estate of PERCY RAY COX, Plaintiff, v. AGCO CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Greenville Division.

September 12, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Asbestos Litigation
Nature of Suit: 368 P.I. : Asbestos
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin D. Braly , Dean Omar Branham LLP.

Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Plaintiff, represented by Sabrina G. Stone , Dean Omar Branham LLP & Janet Ward Black , Ward Black Law.

AGCO Corporation, Defendant, represented by Kelly Street Brown , Young, Moore & Henderson, P.A. & Joseph W. Williford , Young, Moore & Henderson, P.A..

Arvinmeritor, Defendant, represented by Carter T. Lambeth , Carter T. Lambeth Attorney, P.C. & William P. Early , Pierce Herns Sloan and Wilson LLC.

Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc., Defendant, represented by David L. Levy , Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP & Jon S. Player , Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP.

Caterpillar, Inc., Defendant, represented by Charles M. Sprinkle, III , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A., Moffatt G. McDonald , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A., Scott E. Frick , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. & William David Conner , Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A..

Cummins, Inc., Defendant, represented by Erin Elaine Shofner , Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young, Teresa Elizabeth Lazzaroni , Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP & Douglas Andrew Rubel , Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP.

Deere & Company, Inc., Defendant, represented by Tracy E. Tomlin , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Travis Andrew Bustamante , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP & William Michael Starr , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP.

FMC Corporation, Defendant, represented by Gary L. Beaver , Nexsen Pruet, PLLC & Peter A. Santos , Nexsen Pruet, PLLC.

Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Christopher R. Kiger , Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP, Kirk G. Warner , Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP & Addie K.S. Ries , Smith Anderson Blount Dorsett Mitchell & Jernigan, LLP.

Honeywell International, Inc., Defendant, represented by H. Lee Davis, Jr. , Davis & Hamrick, LLP.

Maremont Corporation, Defendant, represented by Carter T. Lambeth , Carter T. Lambeth Attorney, P.C. & William P. Early , Pierce Herns Sloan and Wilson LLC.

Meadwestvaco Corporation, Defendant, represented by Carter T. Lambeth , Carter T. Lambeth Attorney, P.C. & Louis P. Herns , Pierce Herns Sloan and Wilson LLC.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Keith E. Coltrain , Wall Templeton & Haldrup, P.A..

Navistar, Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert O. Meriwether , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, Tracy E. Tomlin , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Travis Andrew Bustamante , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP & William Michael Starr , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Defendant, represented by Robert David Proffitt , Proffitt & Cox, LLP & Ronald Brian Cox , Proffitt & Cox, LLP.

Pneumo Abex LLC, Defendant, represented by Timothy W. Bouch , Leath Bouch & Seekings.

SPX Corporation, Defendant, represented by Gary L. Beaver , Nexsen Pruet, PLLC.

Standard Motor Products, Inc., Defendant, represented by Robert David Proffitt , Proffitt & Cox, LLP & Ronald Brian Cox , Proffitt & Cox, LLP.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Clarification (DE-179), wherein Defendants seek clarification and amendment as to the expert discovery deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order entered at D.E.156. It appearing to the Court that the Motion should be granted for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Reports from retained expert witnesses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B), and disclosures from any expert witness under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C) who will provide an opinion regarding the cause of Decedent's injuries, are due following the fact discovery period:

(i) From Plaintiff by January 19, `. (ii) From Defendants by February 16, `. (iii) Supplementations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) are due as soon as practicable, but no later than 30 days prior to any Daubert motions.

SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases