WEST v. MANSON

Civil No. 2:83-CV-366(RNC).

VALERIE WEST, ET AL., v. COMMISSIONER JOHN R. MANSON, ET AL.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

September 7, 2017.

Editors Note
Cause: No cause code entered
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Valerie West, Plaintiff, represented by Lynn B. Cochrane , Greater Hartford Legal Aid.

Valerie West, Plaintiff, represented by Toya Alek Graham , Toya Alek Graham, Alexis S. Gettier , Day Pitney LLP, Dan Barrett , American Civil Liberties Union, Giovanna E. Shay , Greater Hartford Legal Aid & Linda Allard , Greater Hartford Legal Aid.

Passion Rayne West, Plaintiff, represented by Dan Barrett , American Civil Liberties Union, Lynn B. Cochrane , Greater Hartford Legal Aid, Toya Alek Graham , Toya Alek Graham & Alexis S. Gettier , Day Pitney LLP-Stmfd.

Victoria Bellavita, Plaintiff, represented by Dan Barrett , American Civil Liberties Union, Lynn B. Cochrane , Greater Hartford Legal Aid, Toya Alek Graham , Toya Alek Graham & Alexis S. Gettier , Day Pitney LLP.

Joann Parker, Plaintiff, represented by Dan Barrett , American Civil Liberties Union, Lynn B. Cochrane , Greater Hartford Legal Aid, Toya Alek Graham , Toya Alek Graham & Alexis S. Gettier , Day Pitney LLP.

Donnielle Parker, Plaintiff, represented by Dan Barrett , American Civil Liberties Union, Lynn B. Cochrane , Greater Hartford Legal Aid, Toya Alek Graham , Toya Alek Graham & Alexis S. Gettier , Day Pitney LLP.

Linda Shelton, Plaintiff, represented by Dan Barrett , American Civil Liberties Union, Lynn B. Cochrane , Greater Hartford Legal Aid, Toya Alek Graham , Toya Alek Graham & Alexis S. Gettier , Day Pitney LLP.

John R. Manson, Defendant, represented by Steven R. Strom , Office of the Attorney General.

Marie Cerino, Defendant, represented by Steven R. Strom , Office of the Attorney General.

Comm., DCYS Mark Marcus, Defendant, represented by Steven R. Strom , Office of the Attorney General.

James A. Harnage, Movant, Pro Se.


RULING ON JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e), the parties, including the plaintiff classes of women who are or who in the future will be confined in Connecticut's correctional institution for women and the plaintiff class of children...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases