CITY OF SEATTLE v. TRUMP

Case No. C17-497 RAJ.

CITY OF SEATTLE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

City of Seattle, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew J. Pincus , MAYER BROWN LLP, pro hac vice.

City of Seattle, Plaintiff, represented by Charles A. Rothfeld , MAYER BROWN LLP, pro hac vice, John Lewis , MAYER BROWN LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua Silverstein , MAYER BROWN LLP, pro hac vice, Ori Lev , MAYER BROWN LLP, pro hac vice, Travis Crum , MAYER BROWN LLP, pro hac vice, Carlton Wm Seu , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Gary T. Smith , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Michael K. Ryan , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Peter Samuel Holmes , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE & Gregory Colin Narver , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.

City of Portland, Plaintiff, represented by Denis M. Vannier , OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY, pro hac vice, Tracy Reeve , OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY, pro hac vice, Kymberly K. Evanson , PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP & Paul J. Lawrence , PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP.

Donald J. Trump, Defendant, represented by Stephen J. Buckingham , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

Jefferson B Sessions, III, Defendant, represented by Stephen J. Buckingham , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

John F. Kelly, Defendant, represented by Stephen J. Buckingham , US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

Immigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus, represented by Richard M. Stephens , STEPHENS & KLINGE LLP.


ORDER

RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.

The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) requests leave to file an amicus brief in support of the Government's motion to dismiss. Dkt. # 25.

Having considered the motion and the parties' responses, the Court GRANTS IRLI's request. IRLI's amicus brief is hereby deemed filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases