AMENDMENT TO ORDER DENYING PETITION, ORDER DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND CERTIFYING THAT AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH
J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), the Court amends its Order dated August 3, 2017 (ECF No. 144), to address the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Davila v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 2058 (2017). In Claim L, Petitioner, Stephen Hugueley, alleged ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and argued that he could overcome the procedural default of this claim, relying on Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012). (See ECF No. 144 at PageID 7835-36.) The Court denied the claim as procedurally defaulted in accordance with Sixth Circuit precedent in Hodges v. Colson, 727 F.3d 517, 531 (6th Cir. —). (Id. at PageID 7836.) However, the Court amends its Order to state that Claim L still should be dismissed as procedurally defaulted because Davila resolved a circuit split and, like the Sixth Circuit, declined to extend the equitable exception in Martinez to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims. Davila, 137 S. Ct. at 2070 ("[W]e do not think equity requires an expansion of the Martinez."). All other issues addressed in the Order denying the petition shall remain as stated.
In its original Order, the Court granted a limited certificate of appealability for Claim L. (ECF No. 144 at PageID 7837.) As the issue raised in Davila has been resolved, the Court denies the certificate of appealability for Claim L and the remaining claims in Hugueley's petition and certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.