CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the motions (Docs. 40, 41, 42, 44) by pro se petitioner William Rohland ("Rohland") requesting review under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) of the court's order (Doc. 36) of July 27, 2017 dismissing his second or successive petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus without prejudice to Rohland's right to request leave to file same from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, (Doc. 36), and the court observing that Rule 60(b) allows a district court to "relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding" for several enumerated reasons, FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b), and it appearing from Rohland's reference to "recently discovered obtained evidence" that he seeks relief pursuant to Rule 60(b)(2), which rule permits a court to reopen a judgment when the movant presents "newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered" previously, FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(2),