BRONSON v. BERRYHILL

Case No. 3:16-cv-00319-LRH-WGC.

ELLEN M. BRONSON, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nature of Suit: 864 Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ellen M. Bronson, Plaintiff, represented by Howard D. Olinsky , Olinsky Law Group, pro hac vice.

Ellen M. Bronson, Plaintiff, represented by Hal Taylor , pro hac vice.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Defendant, represented by Daniel G. Bogden , United States Attorney's Office, Holly A. Vance , U.S. Attorney's Office & Sundeep R. Patel , Social Security Administration.


ORDER

LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (ECF No. 19) entered on July 12, 2017, recommending granting in part Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and Remand (ECF No. 13) entered on September 23, 2016, and denying Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 14) entered on October 21, 2016. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) entered on July 12, 2017, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) entered on July 12, 2017, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and Remand (ECF 13) is GRANTED IN PART in accordance with the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 14) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED for further development consistent with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases