BARRANCO v. 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION

No. 3:14-cv-00188-RJC-DSC.

RONALD BARRANCO and PRINT3D CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 3D SYSTEMS, INC., DAMON GREGOIRE, JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10, and DOE ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

Editors Note
Cause: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Barranco, Plaintiff, represented by Mark Poe , Gaw & Poe LLP, pro hac vice.

Ronald Barranco, Plaintiff, represented by Jared E. Gardner , Gardner Skelton PLLC.

Print3D Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Mark Poe , Gaw & Poe LLP & Jared E. Gardner , Gardner Skelton PLLC.

3D Systems Corporation, Defendant, represented by Christopher C. Lam , Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Marguerite S. Willis , Nexsen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, LLC, pro hac vice, Nikole Setzler Mergo , Nexsen Pruet, LLC & William W. Wilkins , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, pro hac vice.

3D Systems, Inc., Defendant, represented by Christopher C. Lam , Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Marguerite S. Willis , Nexsen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, LLC, pro hac vice, Nikole Setzler Mergo , Nexsen Pruet, LLC & William W. Wilkins , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, pro hac vice.

Damon Gregoire, Defendant, represented by Christopher C. Lam , Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Marguerite S. Willis , Nexsen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, LLC, pro hac vice, Nikole Setzler Mergo , Nexsen Pruet, LLC & William W. Wilkins , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, pro hac vice.

John Does 1-10, Defendant, represented by Nikole Setzler Mergo , Nexsen Pruet, LLC.

Jane Does 1-10, Defendant, represented by Nikole Setzler Mergo , Nexsen Pruet, LLC.

Doe Entities 1-10, Defendant, represented by Nikole Setzler Mergo , Nexsen Pruet, LLC.


ORDER

ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Approve Supersedeas Bond by Defendants 3D Systems Corporation and 3D Systems, Inc. (collectively, "3D Systems"). After considering the motion and noting Plaintiffs' consent to the motion, the Court finds that the Supersedeas Bond in the amount of $11,400,763.47 should be approved, and that enforcement of the judgment in this action should be stayed automatically through disposition of 3D Systems' pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Supersedeas Bond is hereby APPROVED and enforcement of the judgment in this action is STAYED automatically through disposition of 3D Systems' appeal to the Fourth Circuit.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases