1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HAYS v. FISHER
 

HAYS v. FISHER

No. 4:16CV156-SA-RP.

HOWARD HAYS, Petitioner, v. MARSHALL FISHER, ET AL., Respondents.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division.

August 9, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Hays, Petitioner, Pro Se.

Marshall Fisher, Respondent, represented by Jerrolyn M. Owens , MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE.

Jim Hood, Respondent, represented by Jerrolyn M. Owens , MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on the pro se petition of Howard Hays for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The State has moved to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The petitioner has not responded to the motion; the deadline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases